Affordable Housing Financing Guide

Tax-Exempt Bonds in Colorado Springs

How Tax-Exempt Bonds Work in Colorado Springs

Tax-exempt bond financing in Colorado Springs operates through Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA), which serves as the primary bond issuer and 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credit allocating agency for the state. Under this structure, CHFA issues private activity bonds against Colorado's annual bond cap allocation, and the bond-financed project automatically qualifies for 4% LIHTC without competing in the 9% competitive round. That non-competitive path is the core appeal for sponsors working at scale: a project that meets the minimum threshold requirement for bond-financed units can lock in tax credit equity without surviving a single application cycle. For Colorado Springs sponsors, that means pairing a CHFA bond commitment with local soft debt sources administered through the City of Colorado Springs Housing Division and, where applicable, El Paso County's separate HOME entitlement program.

The local regulatory layer matters here more than in some markets. The City of Colorado Springs Housing Division administers HOME, CDBG, and local affordable housing gap financing, while the Colorado Springs Housing Authority (CSHA) manages project-based vouchers that can materially improve a project's debt service coverage and investor yield. Sponsors who have navigated both the city and county entitlement programs understand that El Paso County and the City of Colorado Springs run independent HOME allocations, which creates a layering opportunity but also a coordination requirement. The typical sponsor profile closing bond deals in this market is an experienced affordable developer with prior LIHTC closings, a demonstrated ability to manage multi-agency soft debt coordination, and relationships with CHFA sufficient to move through bond reservation and tax credit allocation on a workable timeline.

Colorado Springs's military presence adds a dimension that shapes affordability demand in this market. Fort Carson, Peterson Space Force Base, Schriever Space Force Base, and NORAD collectively generate consistent workforce housing demand across income bands, and the city has active coordination channels with the Department of Defense on housing initiatives. Sponsors targeting workforce or mixed-income affordable product in submarkets near these installations often find stronger political support and, in some cases, additional soft debt alignment from military housing partnership programs.

The Capital Stack in Colorado Springs

A bond deal in Colorado Springs typically assembles around a tax-exempt bond issuance that covers the construction phase, with conversion to permanent bond debt or a takeout at stabilization. The 4% LIHTC equity generated by the bond financing sits alongside multiple soft debt layers. On the state side, CHFA administers its own soft loan programs that can layer beneath the senior debt position, though award amounts and terms vary by cycle and are subject to CHFA's underwriting and policy priorities in any given year. On the local side, the City of Colorado Springs Housing Division gap financing represents a meaningful soft debt source for projects that serve the city's affordability priorities, and El Paso County HOME funds are available independently for projects within the county's jurisdiction.

CSHA project-based vouchers are a significant credit enhancer in this market. A project with a committed PBV contract enters the capital stack with a materially different risk profile than a comparable deal without one, improving both lender coverage and investor pricing. Sponsors should approach CSHA voucher applications early and understand that the timing of a PBV commitment relative to CHFA bond reservation and tax credit allocation requires careful sequencing. Rounding out the stack, sponsor equity and deferred developer fee absorb residual gap, with deferred fee structured within CHFA's limits and investor requirements.

On bond cap competition: Colorado is an active state for private activity bond demand, and CHFA manages its annual cap allocation across multifamily, single-family, and other eligible uses. Multifamily sponsors should not assume bond cap is available on demand. CHFA publishes its allocation calendar, and sponsors who engage early in the predevelopment cycle, before site control is secured in some cases, are better positioned to understand cap availability and timeline. The 4% credit is non-competitive once the bond threshold is met, but the bond cap itself is a constrained resource at the state level.

Active Lender Types for Colorado Springs Affordable Deals

The lender ecosystem for bond deals in Colorado Springs reflects the national affordable housing capital markets, with some market-specific nuances. Mission-focused CDFIs are active construction lenders in Colorado, particularly for projects with complex soft debt stacks or in underserved submarkets where conventional construction lenders are less comfortable. These lenders accept layered soft debt positions and are generally more flexible on predevelopment financing and construction bridge structures, though their pricing reflects the mission subsidy they bring rather than a market-rate return.

Community banks with dedicated affordable housing platforms participate in both construction and permanent lending, often motivated by Community Reinvestment Act considerations. Their appetite in Colorado Springs is real but capacity-limited, and the most competitive terms tend to go to repeat sponsors with established relationships. Life insurance companies with affordable housing allocations are active in the permanent market for stabilized bond deals, particularly where the bond structure and LIHTC compliance create a clean, long-term credit profile that fits their portfolio requirements.

Agency executions through Fannie Mae's Multifamily Affordable Housing program and Freddie Mac's Targeted Affordable Housing platform are the dominant permanent financing options for larger deals. Both programs are structured specifically for LIHTC and bond-financed affordable properties and offer long-term, non-recourse debt that aligns with 55-year affordability covenant requirements. HUD's 221(d)(4) and 223(f) programs are available for construction and permanent financing respectively, and while HUD timelines are longer, the fully assumable, non-recourse structure makes HUD a serious option for the right deal and sponsor profile.

Typical Deal Profile and Timeline

A realistic bond deal in Colorado Springs falls in the range of $20 million to $60 million in total development cost, though the program accommodates larger projects. Unit counts typically run from 80 to 200 units depending on submarket density and land availability. Active development submarkets in the Springs include Fountain, East Colorado Springs, Cimarron Hills, Security-Widefield, the North Nevada corridor, and Southeast Springs, with land basis and entitlement timelines varying meaningfully across those locations.

From site control to construction close, sponsors should budget 18 to 24 months in a best-case scenario, reflecting CHFA bond reservation, tax credit allocation, soft debt applications, lender underwriting, and bond issuance. Construction runs approximately 18 to 24 months for a typical mid-density affordable project. Stabilization follows lease-up, with permanent conversion or takeout occurring 6 to 12 months after construction completion. Total timeline from site control to stabilization is realistically 4 to 5 years. Lenders and investors expect sponsors to demonstrate prior LIHTC project completion, a financially audited development entity, and the organizational capacity to manage the multi-agency compliance environment this program requires.

Common Execution Pitfalls in Colorado Springs

First, sponsors consistently underestimate the coordination complexity between the City of Colorado Springs Housing Division and El Paso County HOME programs. These are independent entitlement programs with separate application cycles, underwriting requirements, and approval timelines. A project that needs both sources to close the gap must manage two public agency processes simultaneously, and a delay in either can push the CHFA bond reservation or tax credit allocation out of cycle.

Second, prevailing wage exposure on bond-financed projects is a material cost driver that some sponsors do not fully account for in early proforma work. Colorado's state prevailing wage requirements, layered with federal Davis-Bacon obligations triggered by HOME or other federal soft debt, can move construction costs in ways that stress an already thin debt coverage ratio. Sponsors should run prevailing wage scenarios early and not rely on pre-prevailing-wage GC bids for financial feasibility conclusions.

Third, CHFA's bond cap allocation calendar does not bend to a sponsor's preferred timeline. Missing the annual reservation window means a one-year reset on the financing structure, which cascades into entitlement expiration risks and extended carrying costs on site control. Sponsors who engage CHFA without understanding the cap calendar often discover the timing mismatch only after committing to site control terms they cannot extend affordably.

Fourth, site control in established Colorado Springs submarkets has become increasingly competitive as market-rate multifamily developers target similar infill and transit-adjacent sites. Affordable developers operating with longer entitlement timelines are at a structural disadvantage in seller negotiations, and option periods that worked in prior cycles may no longer be available at the same terms. Sponsors who have not locked site control with extension rights sufficient to cover CHFA bond reservation and tax credit allocation timelines carry real execution risk.

If you have site control or an active predevelopment process for an affordable multifamily project in Colorado Springs, CLS CRE is available to help structure the financing and identify the right lender and investor relationships for your capital stack. Contact Trevor Damyan directly to discuss your deal. For a full overview of the tax-exempt bond program and its mechanics, visit the Tax-Exempt Bond Financing program guide at clscre.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Tax-Exempt Bonds financing typically look like in Colorado Springs?

In Colorado Springs, tax-exempt bonds deals typically range from $15M to $100M+ total development cost and assemble a stack that includes tax-exempt bond issuance (construction phase), 4% lihtc investor equity, permanent bond issuance or conversion to permanent debt at stabilization, layered with local soft debt from administering agencies including colorado springs housing division gap financing and related programs.

Which lenders close tax-exempt bonds deals in Colorado Springs?

Active capital sources in Colorado Springs include mission-focused CDFIs, community banks with affordable platforms, life insurance companies with affordable allocations, agency lenders (Fannie Mae MAH / Freddie Mac TAH) on the permanent take-out, and HUD 221(d)(4) for larger construction-to-permanent transactions. The specific lender that fits best depends on deal size, sponsor profile, and capital stack complexity.

How does the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA) allocate LIHTC in Colorado Springs?

Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA) administers both the competitive 9% LIHTC allocation rounds and the non-competitive 4% credit pathway for Colorado Springs and the rest of CO. Scoring criteria, set-aside categories, and geographic preferences vary by funding cycle. For 9% deals, understanding how this HFA weights location, income targeting, and sponsor capacity is essential before committing to a specific application round. For 4% LIHTC, the key gating factor is private activity bond cap allocation through the state bond authority.

How long does a tax-exempt bonds deal typically take to close in Colorado Springs?

From site control through construction close, tax-exempt bonds deals in Colorado Springs typically take 18 to 30 months depending on program selection, entitlement pathway, allocation round timing for competitive sources, and sponsor capacity to run multiple application cycles in parallel. Construction itself adds another 18 to 30 months, with stabilization and permanent conversion following.

Why use a broker on a tax-exempt bonds deal in Colorado Springs?

Affordable capital stacks in Colorado Springs typically layer four to six funding sources, each with different underwriting standards, scoring criteria, and allocation calendars. A broker who specializes in affordable housing models the full stack before the first application, sequences the construction loan and permanent take-out so the take-out is locked before construction closes, and knows which lenders are most active in Colorado Springs for this program right now. Commercial Lending Solutions runs this process for sponsors every month.

Have a deal in Colorado Springs?

Send us the site, the program you're targeting, and the entitlement status. We'll come back within 24 hours with the lenders who close this type of deal in Colorado Springs and the stack we'd recommend.

Submit Your Deal