Recourse vs Non-Recourse
Recourse vs Non-Recourse in Practice
A $15,000,000 loan defaults and the property sells in foreclosure for $12,000,000, leaving a $15,000,000 - $12,000,000 = $3,000,000 deficiency. On a full-recourse loan, the lender can pursue the guarantor personally for the entire $3,000,000 plus enforcement costs. On a non-recourse loan, the lender absorbs the loss, provided the borrower committed none of the acts enumerated in the carve-outs.
Recourse vs Non-Recourse: What the Market Actually Requires
Recourse is a lender-type question before it is a negotiation. Banks and credit unions are the recourse lenders: full personal guarantees are their default, and partial recourse of 25% to 50% is what strong sponsorship negotiates. Agency, CMBS, and life company permanent loans are non-recourse as a matter of program design, with liability limited to the bad-boy carve-outs. Debt funds and bridge lenders are mostly non-recourse on standard business plans but frequently require completion guarantees on heavy renovation and carve-out guarantees everywhere.
Construction is its own regime. Ground-up construction loans from banks almost always carry full recourse plus a completion guarantee, and the sophisticated ask is a burn-down: recourse steps down to 50%, then 25%, then zero as the project hits completion, stabilized occupancy, or a DSCR test. Guarantor financial covenants ride along with any recourse. Lenders typically want guarantor net worth at or above the loan amount and liquidity of around 10% of the loan, tested annually.
Negotiation angles that actually move: capping each guarantor's exposure at a several, not joint and several, share when there are multiple partners; burn-down triggers tied to objective tests rather than lender discretion; limiting completion guarantees to hard costs; and trading a modest rate premium for reduced recourse at banks that price the two as a menu. The classic borrower mistake is fixating on the recourse label while ignoring the carve-outs. A non-recourse loan with aggressive carve-out language can be more dangerous than a capped 25% recourse loan, because carve-out liability is uncapped and springs on events partly outside the sponsor's control.
Why It Matters for Your Loan
Recourse determines whether a failed deal costs you the property or the property plus your balance sheet. It also shapes which capital sources you should approach at all: sponsors unwilling to sign personally route to agency, CMBS, life company, and debt fund executions, and accept the pricing and flexibility tradeoffs that come with them. Commercial Lending Solutions matches sponsors to lenders whose recourse posture fits, and negotiates burn-downs, caps, and several liability where guarantees are unavoidable.
Related Terms
Recourse vs Non-Recourse: FAQ
Put This Knowledge to Work
Understanding Recourse vs Non-Recourse is step one. Commercial Lending Solutions structures deals around these numbers every day, across 1,000+ lenders. Free deal review, response within 24 hours.
Apply for Financing →